[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20101203152733.GA25580@Krystal>
Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2010 10:27:33 -0500
From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/2 v2] tracing: Add TRACE_EVENT_CONDITIONAL()
* Steven Rostedt (rostedt@...dmis.org) wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-12-02 at 23:54 -0500, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
[...]
> >
> > One small documentation-related detail: my guess is that you are leaving
> > "cond" without likely/unlikely builtin expect purposefully so that we
> > can write, in TP_CONDITION:
> >
> > TP_CONDITION(unlikely(someparam)),
>
> I actually think this is an abuse of "unlikely".
Why are you considering this an abuse ?
Mathieu
--
Mathieu Desnoyers
Operating System Efficiency R&D Consultant
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists