[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20101203155536.GB10050@sequoia.sous-sol.org>
Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2010 07:55:36 -0800
From: Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
Cc: Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Avi Kiviti <avi@...hat.com>,
Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Anthony Liguori <aliguori@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/3] kvm: keep track of which task is running a KVM
vcpu
* Rik van Riel (riel@...hat.com) wrote:
> On 12/02/2010 08:18 PM, Chris Wright wrote:
> >* Rik van Riel (riel@...hat.com) wrote:
> >>Keep track of which task is running a KVM vcpu. This helps us
> >>figure out later what task to wake up if we want to boost a
> >>vcpu that got preempted.
> >>
> >>Unfortunately there are no guarantees that the same task
> >>always keeps the same vcpu, so we can only track the task
> >>across a single "run" of the vcpu.
> >
> >So shouldn't it confine to KVM_RUN? The other vcpu_load callers aren't
> >always a vcpu in a useful runnable state.
>
> Yeah, probably. If you want I can move the setting of
> vcpu->task to kvm_vcpu_ioctl.
Or maybe setting in sched_out and unsetting in sched_in.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists