[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20101203070950.GA19071@infradead.org>
Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2010 02:09:50 -0500
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@...ibm.com>
Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-ext4 <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext4: Set barrier=0 when block device does not advertise
flush support
On Thu, Dec 02, 2010 at 04:16:59PM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> If the user tries to enable write flushes with "barrier=1" and the underlying
> block device does not support flushes, print a message and set barrier=0.
That doesn't make any sense at all with the ne wFLUSH+FUA code, which is
designed to make the cache flushing entirely transparanent. Basically
with the new code the barrier option should become a no-op and always
enabled.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists