linux-kernel - Re: hunt for 2.6.37 dm-crypt+ext4 corruption? (was: Re: dm-crypt barrier support is effective)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20101204205120.GA17542@fritha.org>
Date:	Sat, 4 Dec 2010 21:51:20 +0100
From:	Heinz Diehl <htd@...tha.org>
To:	Matt <jackdachef@...il.com>
Cc:	Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>, Milan Broz <mbroz@...hat.com>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	linux-btrfs <linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org>,
	dm-devel <dm-devel@...hat.com>,
	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	htd <htd@...cy-poultry.org>,
	Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com>, htejun@...il.com,
	linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, Jon Nelson <jnelson@...poni.net>
Subject: Re: hunt for 2.6.37 dm-crypt+ext4 corruption? (was: Re: dm-crypt
 barrier support is effective)

On 04.12.2010, Matt wrote: 

> I'm not sure if it's even a problem with ext4 - I haven't had the time
> to test with XFS yet

I can and have run both -rc3 and -rc4 with Milans patch v6, without any problems at
all, under heavy load and disk I/O. I'm using XFS exclusively. The system
is a testing server and contains 3 harddisks, 2 SATA disks and one SSD.
The whole system runs flawlessly, without any corruption...






--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/