[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTimmZE0QROje3vLKJOa+uVFfNqiGNF_MJ9vt9xHW@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 4 Dec 2010 23:55:57 +0000
From: James Courtier-Dutton <james.dutton@...il.com>
To: Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] sched: automated per session task groups
On 3 December 2010 05:11, Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> I actually don't have a desktop setup handy to test "interactivity" (sad but
> true -- working on grabbing one). But it looks better on under synthetic
> load.
>
What tools are actually used to test "interactivity" ?
I posted a tool to the list some time ago, but I don't think anyone noticed.
My tool is very simple.
When you hold a key down, it should repeat. It should repeat at a
constant predictable interval.
So, my tool just waits for key presses and times when each one occurred.
The tester simply presses a key and holds it down.
If the time between each key press is constant, it indicates good
"interactivity". If the time between each key press varies a lot, it
indicates bad "interactivity".
You can reliably test if one kernel is better than the next using
actual measurable figures.
Kind Regards
James
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists