[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTikHhkK8WaFxOL+HkaCY97PCvFfON8cQV0xU_-0u@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 4 Dec 2010 00:41:20 -0500
From: John Drescher <drescherjm@...il.com>
To: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...il.com>
Cc: Cédric Villemain
<cedric.villemain.debian@...il.com>, linux-bcache@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Bcache version 9
>> Is it its main diff with flashcache ?
>> https://github.com/facebook/flashcache/blob/master/doc/flashcache-doc.txt
>
> Yeah. It's a more complex approach, but it's capable of significantly higher
> performance. Performance has regressed some lately (I've been concentrating
> on other things and don't really have the hardware for performance work),
> but a month or so ago it was benchmarking around 50% higher than flashcache,
> with mysql on an X25-E.
BTW, Thanks for releasing this..
I am just in the middle of evaluating using flashcache to speed up
slow IO in kvm clients when storing the VMs on hard disks. I will when
I get a chance try your patch..
John
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists