[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <s5h1v5wv6gv.wl%tiwai@suse.de>
Date: Sun, 05 Dec 2010 11:50:40 +0100
From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
To: Chris Ball <cjb@...top.org>
Cc: Philip Rakity <prakity@...vell.com>, linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Aries Lee <arieslee@...cron.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] mmc: Test bus-width for old MMC devices
Hi Chris,
At Sun, 5 Dec 2010 04:02:24 +0000,
Chris Ball wrote:
>
> Hi Takashi, Philip,
>
> On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 07:21:14AM +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > From: Aries Lee <arieslee@...cron.com>
> >
> > Some old MMC devices fail with the 4/8 bits the driver tries to use
> > exclusively. This patch adds a test for the given bus setup and falls
> > back to the lower bit mode (until 1-bit mode) when the test fails.
> >
> > [Major rework and refactoring by tiwai]
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Aries Lee <arieslee@...cron.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
>
> We have two independent patches for performing MMC bus-width testing now:
>
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/351781/
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/361702/
Yeah, Philip and I discussed shortly in a mail thread after that.
> I'm planning on taking Takashi's since it looks a little cleaner; Philip,
> please could you take a look at Takashi's patch and add anything you
> think should be present from your own patch as a new incremental patch?
One missing thing in my (originally Aries') patch is the quirk bit to
enable/disable the bus-width test. In Philip's latest patch, the
default is off.
I'm also not sure whether this bus-width test should be enabled as
default. I guess it's better for performance, so I'd vote for turning
on as default. But, having a quirk for turning off would be safer for
working around old hardware problems, of course.
thanks,
Takashi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists