[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4CFCC048.4030408@ru.mvista.com>
Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2010 13:51:52 +0300
From: Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@...sta.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
CC: Paulius Zaleckas <paulius.zaleckas@...il.com>,
Hans Ulli Kroll <ulli.kroll@...glemail.com>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: Gemini: Add support for PCI BUS
Hello.
On 29-11-2010 19:45, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>> The I/O ordering is probably not what you think it is.
>>> There is no ordering guarantee between __raw_writel and
>>> spin_lock/spin_unlock, so you really should be using
>>> readl/writel.
>> No he really should NOT use readl/writel. The ONLY difference
>> between readl/writel and __raw_readl/__raw_writel is endianess
>> conversion. __raw_*l is not doing it. Which to use depend only
>> on HW.
> There are many differences between readl and __raw_readl, including
> * __raw_readl does not have barriers and does not serialize with
> spinlocks, so it breaks on out-of-order CPUs.
> * __raw_readl does not have a specific endianess, while readl is
> fixed little-endian,
I know I'm late but readl()/writel() are CPU-endian, not LE.
WBR, Sergei
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists