[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1291639057.1848.85.camel@holzheu-laptop>
Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2010 13:37:37 +0100
From: Michael Holzheu <holzheu@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Shailabh Nagar <nagar1234@...ibm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
John stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>, Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch v2 4/4] taskstats: Export "cdata_wait" CPU times with
taskstats
Hello Balbir,
On Fri, 2010-12-03 at 13:03 +0530, Balbir Singh wrote:
> * Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com> [2010-12-01 19:51:28]:
>
> > On 11/29, Michael Holzheu wrote:
[snip]
> > Say, taskstats_exit()->fill_stats()->bacct_add_tsk(). Every thread
> > does this, including the group_leader. But, it is possible that
> > group_leader exits first, before other threads. IOW, what
> > stats->ac_cXtime actually mean?
> >
>
> stats->ac_* time was designed only for tgid's to begin with,
You mean for tids (threads/tasks), no? stats->ac_* time is only reported
for threads in bacct_add_tsk() and not for tgids.
> so I am
> not sure if ac_cXtime makes sense for threads
I would suggest to do it the same way as /proc/<tgid>/tasks/<tid>/stat.
It reports the (same) cumulative time for each thread. See
do_task_stat() in fs/proc/array.c. So IMHO also for taskstats it makes
sense to include the cXtime for all threads and not only for the thread
group leader.
Also I would include tgid in taskstats so that userspace can group the
tasks into thread groups.
I am not sure regarding the aggregation for tgids in
TASKSTATS_CMD_ATTR_TGID and exit events with group_dead=1. Currently
only the delay accounting numbers are aggregated. If we would do it
like /proc/<tgid>/stat (do_task_stat() with whole=1) we also could
aggregate also the other values e.g. the CPU time.
I think the following tgid data would make sense to be returned for
TASKSTATS_CMD_ATTR_TGID and exit events with group_dead=1:
bacct_add_tsk():
----------------
ac_pid thread group leader (tsk->tgid)
ac_etime thread group leader
ac_btime thread group leader
ac_nice thread group leader
ac_sched thread group leader
ac_uid thread group leader
ac_gid thread group leader
ac_ppid thread group leader
ac_comm thread group leader
ac_exit_code thread group leader
ac_flags thread group leader
ac_utimescaled ??
ac_stimescaled ??
ac_utime sum for all live threads + cdata_threads
ac_stime sum for all live threads + cdata_threads
ac_minflt sum for all live threads + cdata_threads
ac_majflt sum for all live threads + cdata_threads
new:
ac_cutime cdata_wait
ac_cstime cdata_wait
ac_tgid thread group leader
xacct_add_tsk():
----------------
coremem ?
virtmem ?
hiwater_rss thread group leader
hiwater_vm thread group leader
read_char sum for all live threads + tsk->signal.ioac
write_char sum for all live threads + tsk->signal.ioac
read_syscalls sum for all live threads + tsk->signal.ioac
write_syscalls sum for all live threads + tsk->signal.ioac
read_bytes sum for all live threads + tsk->signal.ioac
write bytes sum for all live threads + tsk->signal.ioac
cancelled_write_bytes sum for all live threads + tsk->signal.ioac
If we leave everything as it currently is for tgid accounting, we
probably should also not include the cXtime for tgids and just include
the data for threads (TASKSTATS_CMD_ATTR_PID and task exit events).
What do you think?
Michael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists