[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20101206140506.GE31777@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2010 14:05:06 +0000
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
To: Marek Belisko <marek.belisko@...n-nandra.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm: ecard: Fix compilation warning.
On Mon, Dec 06, 2010 at 03:04:03PM +0100, Marek Belisko wrote:
> Fix following compilation warning:
> arch/arm/kernel/ecard.c:1066: warning: ignoring return value of
> 'device_register', declared with attribute warn_unused_result
>
> Signed-off-by: Marek Belisko <marek.belisko@...n-nandra.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/kernel/ecard.c | 6 ++++--
> 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/ecard.c b/arch/arm/kernel/ecard.c
> index eed2f79..da882b1 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/kernel/ecard.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/ecard.c
> @@ -1063,8 +1063,10 @@ ecard_probe(int slot, card_type_t type)
> *ecp = ec;
> slot_to_expcard[slot] = ec;
>
> - device_register(&ec->dev);
> -
> + rc = device_register(&ec->dev);
> + if (rc)
> + goto nodev;
> +
> return 0;
No. It is important that cards which are actually there remain present
even if device_register fails. In other words, we _really_ don't care
what device_register() returns.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists