lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 06 Dec 2010 12:00:13 -0800
From:	Chase Douglas <chase.douglas@...onical.com>
To:	Chris Bagwell <chris@...bagwell.com>
CC:	Henrik Rydberg <rydberg@...omail.se>,
	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
	Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>, Ping Cheng <pingc@...om.com>,
	Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@...-t.net>,
	linux-input@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] input: mt: Move tracking and pointer emulation to
 input-mt (rev2)

On 12/06/2010 11:52 AM, Chris Bagwell wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 12:40 PM, Chase Douglas
> <chase.douglas@...onical.com> wrote:
>> On 12/01/2010 09:21 AM, Henrik Rydberg wrote:
>>> The drivers using the type B protocol all report tracking information
>>> the same way. The contact id is semantically equivalent to
>>> ABS_MT_SLOT, and the handling of ABS_MT_TRACKING_ID only complicates
>>> the driver. The situation can be improved upon by providing a common
>>> pointer emulation code, thereby removing the need for the tracking id
>>> in the driver.  This patch moves all tracking event handling over to
>>> the input core, simplifying both the existing drivers and the ones
>>> currently in preparation.
>>
>> When two or more fingers are down, one of the fingers controls
>> ABS_{X,Y}. I think the aim is to emulate current behavior for
>> synaptics-style touchpads, which average the position in firmware. Thus,
>> we should be averaging the touch positions to generate the ABS_{X,Y} values.
>>
> 
> At least for modern synaptics hardware, it does track to first touch
> like this patch does.
> 
> It is maybe a weighted average were its 90% first finger and 10%
> second finger.  Just moving second finger gives slight movement.

Ok. Does this present any usability issues, or does it seem to work fine
in your opinion? If it works ok in normal use cases then I'm fine with
how this is implemented.

-- Chase
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ