linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] bluetooth: Use printf extension %pMbt

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20101206200751.GF883@vigoh>
Date:	Mon, 6 Dec 2010 18:07:51 -0200
From:	"Gustavo F. Padovan" <padovan@...fusion.mobi>
To:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc:	Michał Mirosław <mirqus@...il.com>,
	Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] bluetooth: Use printf extension %pMbt

Hi Joe,

* Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> [2010-12-06 10:50:13 -0800]:

> On Mon, 2010-12-06 at 16:15 -0200, Gustavo F. Padovan wrote:
> > This patch doesn't apply to the bluetooth-next-2.6 tree.
> > Can you please rebase it against the bluetooth-next-2.6 tree?
> 
> No worries, it was done against next-20101202.
> 
> Do you care about using %pMR vs %pMbt as Michał suggested in
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2010/12/4/21 ?

I'm fine either way. It depends more if another subsystem will want to use
%pMR or not as you said.

-- 
Gustavo F. Padovan
http://profusion.mobi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/