linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 3/7] move memcg reclaimable page into tail of inactive list

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20101206033455.GA3158@balbir.in.ibm.com>
Date:	Mon, 6 Dec 2010 09:04:55 +0530
From:	Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
	linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/7] move memcg reclaimable page into tail of
 inactive list

* MinChan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com> [2010-12-06 02:29:11]:

> Golbal page reclaim moves reclaimalbe pages into inactive list

Some typos here and Rik already pointed out some other changes.

> to reclaim asap. This patch apply the rule in memcg.
> It can help to prevent unnecessary working page eviction of memcg.
> 
> Cc: Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
> Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
> Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>
> ---
>  include/linux/memcontrol.h |    6 ++++++
>  mm/memcontrol.c            |   27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  mm/swap.c                  |    3 ++-
>  3 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/memcontrol.h b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> index 067115c..8317f5c 100644
> --- a/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> +++ b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> @@ -62,6 +62,7 @@ extern int mem_cgroup_cache_charge(struct page *page, struct mm_struct *mm,
>  					gfp_t gfp_mask);
>  extern void mem_cgroup_add_lru_list(struct page *page, enum lru_list lru);
>  extern void mem_cgroup_del_lru_list(struct page *page, enum lru_list lru);
> +extern void mem_cgroup_rotate_reclaimable_page(struct page *page);
>  extern void mem_cgroup_rotate_lru_list(struct page *page, enum lru_list lru);
>  extern void mem_cgroup_del_lru(struct page *page);
>  extern void mem_cgroup_move_lists(struct page *page,
> @@ -207,6 +208,11 @@ static inline void mem_cgroup_del_lru_list(struct page *page, int lru)
>  	return ;
>  }
> 
> +static inline inline void mem_cgroup_rotate_reclaimable_page(struct page *page)
> +{
> +	return ;
> +}
> +
>  static inline void mem_cgroup_rotate_lru_list(struct page *page, int lru)
>  {
>  	return ;
> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> index 729beb7..f9435be 100644
> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -829,6 +829,33 @@ void mem_cgroup_del_lru(struct page *page)
>  	mem_cgroup_del_lru_list(page, page_lru(page));
>  }
> 
> +/*
> + * Writeback is about to end against a page which has been marked for immediate
> + * reclaim.  If it still appears to be reclaimable, move it to the tail of the
> + * inactive list.
> + */
> +void mem_cgroup_rotate_reclaimable_page(struct page *page)
> +{
> +	struct mem_cgroup_per_zone *mz;
> +	struct page_cgroup *pc;
> +	enum lru_list lru = page_lru_base_type(page);
> +
> +	if (mem_cgroup_disabled())
> +		return;
> +
> +	pc = lookup_page_cgroup(page);
> +	/*
> +	 * Used bit is set without atomic ops but after smp_wmb().
> +	 * For making pc->mem_cgroup visible, insert smp_rmb() here.
> +	 */
> +	smp_rmb();
> +	/* unused or root page is not rotated. */
> +	if (!PageCgroupUsed(pc) || mem_cgroup_is_root(pc->mem_cgroup))
> +		return;
> +	mz = page_cgroup_zoneinfo(pc);
> +	list_move_tail(&pc->lru, &mz->lists[lru]);
> +}
> +
>  void mem_cgroup_rotate_lru_list(struct page *page, enum lru_list lru)
>  {
>  	struct mem_cgroup_per_zone *mz;
> diff --git a/mm/swap.c b/mm/swap.c
> index 1f36f6f..0fe98e7 100644
> --- a/mm/swap.c
> +++ b/mm/swap.c
> @@ -122,8 +122,9 @@ static void pagevec_move_tail(struct pagevec *pvec)
>  		}
>  		if (PageLRU(page) && !PageActive(page) &&
>  					!PageUnevictable(page)) {
> -			int lru = page_lru_base_type(page);
> +			enum lru_list lru = page_lru_base_type(page);
>  			list_move_tail(&page->lru, &zone->lru[lru].list);
> +			mem_cgroup_rotate_reclaimable_page(page);
>  			pgmoved++;
>  		}
>  	}

Looks good, do you have any numbers, workloads that benefit? I agree
that keeping both global and memcg reclaim in sync is a good idea.

Acked-by: Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
 

-- 
	Three Cheers,
	Balbir
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/