[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20101206234213.4e3c6ae6@marmite>
Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2010 23:42:13 +0100
From: Michel Arboi <michel@...oi.fr.eu.org>
To: Giel van Schijndel <me@...tis.eu>
Cc: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ana.be>,
linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Patch for Fintek F71869 watchdoh
On Mon, 6 Dec 2010 21:21:55 +0100
Giel van Schijndel <me@...tis.eu> wrote:
> That's intended behaviour and probably sufficient for testing. Most
> of the behaviour isn't chip-specific, only the initialisation and
> configuration of the chip is specific to that chip AFAIK.
OK. Hans, if you need some tests for the sensors part, you can send me a
patch and I'll try to help.
[I suspect that the current Linux code works, sensors reports 62 °C /
59 °C for the CPU]
> PS You might want to include patches inline (i.e. as part of the
> message text) as that's standard procedure for Linux MLs. That
> allows easy reviewing and commenting on patches.
OK. In fact I did not know how to submit a kernel patch.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists