linux-kernel - Re: [dm-devel] hunt for 2.6.37 dm-crypt+ext4 corruption?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20101206070837.GA6589@fritha.org>
Date:	Mon, 6 Dec 2010 08:08:37 +0100
From:	Heinz Diehl <htd@...tha.org>
To:	Daniel J Blueman <daniel.blueman@...il.com>
Cc:	Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>,
	device-mapper development <dm-devel@...hat.com>,
	Jon Nelson <jnelson@...poni.net>, htejun@...il.com,
	Matt <jackdachef@...il.com>, Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>,
	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com>,
	htd <htd@...cy-poultry.org>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-btrfs <linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [dm-devel] hunt for 2.6.37 dm-crypt+ext4 corruption?

On 06.12.2010, Daniel J Blueman wrote: 

> A bit late to the party, but does memtest86 pass over multiple iterations?

Yes, it does. This machine had not a single fault in several years, it's
absolutely rock-stable. These freezes/corruptions are the first ones ever,
and they vanish when I go down to 2.6.36 or revert the latest dm-crypt
multi-cpu patch with 2.6.37-rc.

> Also, can you send an 'sudo lspci -vv', so we can check for
> known-buggy controllers and bridges?

It's attached.


View attachment "lspci.txt" of type "text/plain" (21582 bytes)