[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201012071004.58311.arnd@arndb.de>
Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2010 10:04:58 +0100
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>
Cc: Jesper Juhl <jj@...osbits.net>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/45] kstrtox: converting strings to integers done (hopefully) right
On Monday 06 December 2010 16:16:36 Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> > <snip>
> >> +/* Internal, do not use. */
> >> +int _kstrtol(const char *s, unsigned int base, long *res)
> >> +{
> >> + long long tmp;
> >> + int rv;
> >> +
> >> + rv = kstrtoll(s, base, &tmp);
> >> + if (rv < 0)
> >> + return rv;
> >> + if (tmp != (long long)(long)tmp)
> >> + return -EINVAL;
> >> + *res = tmp;
> >> + return 0;
> >> +}
> >> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(_kstrtol);
> >
> > Ok, probably I'm just being dense, but the "_" prefix tells me I probably
> > shouldn't use this function. The comment clearly tells me I shouldn't use
> > this function.
> > So, why is this exported? And if it is not/should not be exported, then
> > why is it not static?
> > (goes for other functions in this patch as well).
>
> It is used by kstrtol() if "long" and "long long" aren't the same type.
> I can't ifdef it because gcc doesn't allow "#if sizeof(long long) == ".
> "Do not use" hints "use kstrtol()".
Can't you use #ifdef CONFIG_64BIT to see if long is 64 bit wide?
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists