lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20101207094841.GA4772@sortiz-mobl>
Date:	Tue, 7 Dec 2010 10:48:42 +0100
From:	Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>
To:	Paul Walmsley <paul@...an.com>
Cc:	Bryan Wu <bryan.wu@...onical.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-omap@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MFD: TWL/TPS: fix twl_probe section mismatch warning
 in mfd/twl-core.c

Hi Paul,

On Mon, Dec 06, 2010 at 06:40:38PM -0700, Paul Walmsley wrote:
> On Tue, 7 Dec 2010, Bryan Wu wrote:
> 
> > On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 8:35 AM, Paul Walmsley <paul@...an.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Fix the following section mismatch warning when building omap2plus_defconfig:
> > >
> > > WARNING: vmlinux.o(.data+0x47d7c): Section mismatch in reference from the variable twl_driver to the function .init.text:twl_probe()
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Paul Walmsley <paul@...an.com>
> > > Cc: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/mfd/twl-core.c |    2 +-
> > >  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/mfd/twl-core.c b/drivers/mfd/twl-core.c
> > > index 35275ba..615cf38 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/mfd/twl-core.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/mfd/twl-core.c
> > > @@ -969,7 +969,7 @@ static int twl_remove(struct i2c_client *client)
> > >  }
> > >
> > >  /* NOTE:  this driver only handles a single twl4030/tps659x0 chip */
> > > -static int __init
> > > +static int
> > 
> > I think we might change __init to __devinit.
> > 
> > >  twl_probe(struct i2c_client *client, const struct i2c_device_id *id)
> > >  {
> > >        int                             status;
> > > --
> 
> That's fine with me.  Samuel et al, Bryan's already done a patch 
> for this stuff:
> 
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/367011/
> 
> so we should use that instead, if you're happy with it.  Samuel, maybe we 
> could get an ack from you on it?
The twl driver is not OMAP specific, so this should be a separate patch thatI
will merge to my mfd tree.
If you really insist in pushing this through Tony's tree, then please add my
Acked-by for the mfd part.

Cheers,
Samuel.


-- 
Intel Open Source Technology Centre
http://oss.intel.com/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ