[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201012071004.22291.sheng@linux.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2010 10:04:22 +0800
From: Sheng Yang <sheng@...ux.intel.com>
To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] xen: HVM X2APIC support
On Tuesday 07 December 2010 04:40:54 Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > +static inline uint32_t xen_cpuid_base(void)
> > +{
> > + uint32_t base, eax, ebx, ecx, edx;
> > + char signature[13];
> > +
> > + for (base = 0x40000000; base < 0x40010000; base += 0x100) {
> > + cpuid(base, &eax, &ebx, &ecx, &edx);
> > + *(uint32_t *)(signature + 0) = ebx;
> > + *(uint32_t *)(signature + 4) = ecx;
> > + *(uint32_t *)(signature + 8) = edx;
> > + signature[12] = 0;
> > +
> > + if (!strcmp("XenVMMXenVMM", signature) && ((eax - base) >= 2))
> > + return base;
> > + }
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_XEN
> > +extern bool xen_hvm_need_lapic(void);
> > +
> > +static inline bool xen_para_available(void)
> > +{
> > + return xen_hvm_need_lapic();
> > +}
> > +#else
> > +static inline bool xen_para_available(void)
> > +{
> > + return (xen_cpuid_base() != 0);
>
> Would it make sense to collapse the kvm_para_available and
> the xen_cpuid_base together (and maybe even the HyperV detection code)
> together in one and just return "x2_apic_para_capable" ?
Well, no hyper-v now. But put them together is a good idea.
--
regards
Yang, Sheng
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists