linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/3] perf: Allow strong and weak functions in LIB

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20101207145516.GA7612@ghostprotocols.net>
Date:	Tue, 7 Dec 2010 12:55:16 -0200
From:	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>
To:	Ian Munsie <imunsie@....ibm.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] perf: Allow strong and weak functions in LIB_OBJS

Em Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 05:42:58PM +1100, Ian Munsie escreveu:
> Excerpts from Ian Munsie's message of Mon Nov 29 11:53:07 +1100 2010:
> > I'm not seeing any of those warnings or errors on either of the systems
> > I have been testing on (x86_64 + PPC64), but it looks like the linker is
> > trying to pull in too much from the system libraries.
> > 
> > Can you test the below patch to see if the messages go away - it only
> > applies the whole-archive flag to libperf.a, whereas before I was also
> > applying it to pthread, libelf, etc.
> 
> Hey Arnaldo,
> 
> Just wondering if you got around to testing this patch?

Yeah, fell thru the cracks, but I tested it now on several systems and
it now seems ok, applying to perf/core, thanks,

- Arnaldo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/