linux-kernel - bugs/regressions: report in LKML or in bugzilla?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <201012071639.58884.Martin@lichtvoll.de>
Date:	Tue, 7 Dec 2010 16:39:46 +0100
From:	Martin Steigerwald <Martin@...htvoll.de>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: bugs/regressions: report in LKML or in bugzilla?

Hi!

I reported some regressions to bugzilla that did not receive any 
attentation so far:

[Bug 23792] New: openvpn: failure to unregister tap1 device, possibly 
related to some netconsole issue
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23792

[Bug 23642] New: easycap driver fails to compile in 2.6.37-rc3
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23642

A participant of a linux performance training I hold found a bug with 
window scaling which did not receive any reply as well:

Bug 20312 -  System freeze with multiples of 32 in 
/proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_adv_win_scale
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20312

Is it better to report on LKML? I have the impression that bug reports 
onto the mailinglist are more easily recognized.

I also find it difficult to find the right component when reporting a problem 
in bugzilla. Thus reports might not go to the right persons.

Please advice.

Ciao,
-- 
Martin 'Helios' Steigerwald - http://www.Lichtvoll.de
GPG: 03B0 0D6C 0040 0710 4AFA  B82F 991B EAAC A599 84C7

Download attachment "signature.asc " of type "application/pgp-signature" (199 bytes)