[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20101207164811.GA25344@core.coreip.homeip.net>
Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2010 08:48:12 -0800
From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
To: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
Cc: Henrik Rydberg <rydberg@...omail.se>,
Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>, linux-input@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ping Cheng <pingc@...om.com>,
Chris Bagwell <chris@...bagwell.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] input: Introduce device information ioctl
On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 08:22:22AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 08:25:26AM +0100, Henrik Rydberg wrote:
> > /**
> > + * struct input_devinfo - device information via EVIOCGDEVINFO ioctl
> > + * @types: bitmask of types (DEVTYPE_*) matching this device
> > + * @capabilities: bitmask of capabilities (DEVCAPS_*) of this device
> > + *
> > + * This struct provides information about the device needed for
> > + * automatic setup in userspace, such as if the device is direct
> > + * (touchscreen) or indirect (touchpad), and if there are other
> > + * special considerations, such as the touchpad also being a button.
> > + */
> > +struct input_devinfo {
> > + __u32 types;
> > + __u32 capabilities;
> > +};
>
> Why use an ioctl for this at all? It's just 2 simple values that don't
> need to be atomically read at the same time. What's wrong with 2 more
> sysfs files?
>
Because if you already dealing with a file descriptor ioctl is much more
convenient. Sysfs can be nice (and that is why we'll add it as well) but
it is not a recipe for the world peace.
--
Dmitry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists