[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201012071911.39270.hverkuil@xs4all.nl>
Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2010 19:11:39 +0100
From: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Cc: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
sakari.ailus@...well.research.nokia.com, lennart@...ttering.net
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH v6 03/12] media: Entities, pads and links
On Tuesday, December 07, 2010 18:55:05 Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 06:13:35PM +0100, Hans Verkuil wrote:
>
> > Personally I think this is perfectly clear. The original confusion came from
> > the word 'active', which I understand means 'streaming' in alsa. By adding
> > a 'streaming' flag in addition to the active flag I think it will be clear
> > that 'active' and 'streaming' are two different things.
>
> It's not that, it's the fact that active sounds to me like the link
> ought to be powered up which isn't the case - it's too verby. Like I
> say, I think I'd prefer a more passive name like "connected".
Ah, now I understand what you mean. Would 'activated' be better than 'active'?
Or perhaps just say: the link 'is on' or the link 'is switched on'?
So: ...LINK_SWITCHED_ON (sorry, forgot what the prefix is).
Actually, I think 'switched on' is a pretty good description of what is going on
in the hardware.
Regards,
Hans
> I guess if nobody else finds it confusing I can live with it.
>
--
Hans Verkuil - video4linux developer - sponsored by Cisco
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists