[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20101207182243.GB21112@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2010 13:22:43 -0500
From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>
To: Jon Nelson <jnelson@...poni.net>
Cc: Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com>, Matt <jackdachef@...il.com>,
Milan Broz <mbroz@...hat.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
linux-btrfs <linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org>,
dm-devel <dm-devel@...hat.com>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
htd <htd@...cy-poultry.org>, htejun@...il.com,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: hunt for 2.6.37 dm-crypt+ext4 corruption? (was: Re: dm-crypt
barrier support is effective)
On Tue, Dec 07 2010 at 1:10pm -0500,
Jon Nelson <jnelson@...poni.net> wrote:
> I finally found some time to test this out. With 2.6.37-rc4 (openSUSE
> KOTD kernel) I easily encounter the issue.
>
> Using a virtual machine, I created a stock, minimal openSUSE 11.3 x86_64
> install, installed all updates, installed postgresql and the 'KOTD'
> (Kernel of the Day)
> kernel, and ran the following tests (as postgres user because I'm
> lazy).
>
> 1. create a database (from bash):
>
> createdb test
>
> 2. place the following contents in a file (I used 't.sql'):
>
> begin;
> create temporary table foo as select x as a, ARRAY[x] as b FROM
> generate_series(1, 10000000 ) AS x;
> create index foo_a_idx on foo (a);
> create index foo_b_idx on foo USING GIN (b);
> rollback;
>
> 3. execute that sql:
>
> psql -f t.sql --echo-all test
>
>
> With 2.6.34.7 I can re-run [3] all day long, as many times as I want,
> without issue.
>
> With 2.6.37-rc4-13 (the currently-installed KOTD kernel) if tails
> pretty frequently.
How does it fail? postgres errors? kernel errors?
> Then I tested with the 'vanilla' kernel available here:
>
> http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/Kernel:/vanilla/standard/
>
> The 'vanilla' kernel exhibited the same problems.
> The version I tested: 2.6.37-rc4-219-g771f8bc-vanilla.
>
> Incidentally, quick tests of jfs, xfs, and ext3 do _not_ show the same
> problems, although I will note that I usually saw failure at least 1
> in 3, but sometimes had to re-run the sql test 4 or 5 times before I
> saw failure.
>
> I will continue to do some testing, but I will hold off on testing the
> commits above until I receive further testing suggestions.
OK, so to be clear: your testing is on dm-crypt + ext4?
And you're testing upstream based kernels (meaning the dm-crypt
scalability patch that has been in question is _not_ in the mix)?
That is a very different report than the other 2 reports of corruption
(those corruption instances were only seen once the dm-crypt scalability
patch was introduced).
Mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists