[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4CFE919A.1040704@euromail.se>
Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2010 20:57:14 +0100
From: Henrik Rydberg <rydberg@...omail.se>
To: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
CC: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>, linux-input@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ping Cheng <pingc@...om.com>,
Chris Bagwell <chris@...bagwell.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] input: Introduce device information ioctl
On 12/07/2010 10:16 AM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> Hi Henrik,
>
> On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 08:25:26AM +0100, Henrik Rydberg wrote:
>> Today, userspace sets up an input device based on the data it emits.
>> This is not always enough; a tablet and a touchscreen may emit exactly
>> the same data, for instance, but the former should be set up with a
>> pointer whereas the latter does not need to. Recently, a new type of
>> touchpad has emerged where the buttons are under the pad, which changes
>> handling logic without changing the emitted data. This patch introduces
>> a new ioctl, EVIOCGDEVINFO, which allows userspace to extract information
>> about the device resulting in proper setup.
>
> If we agree that the new ioctl is suitable we'llalso need to wireit up
> through sysfs. Also, can we keep all definitions to INPUT_ namespace?
>
> Thanks.
>
Thanks all for the comments, this is what I extract from them:
* Split struct into separate calls, although this still seems debated.
* Use INPUT_ namespace
* Add sysfs version
* Keep bitmask for types. Is the list of types complete?
* Still only one data point for capabilities. Anything else?
Sounds about right?
Thanks,
Henrik
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists