[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1291755776.21627.13.camel@bwh-desktop>
Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2010 21:02:56 +0000
From: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: Martin Steigerwald <Martin@...htvoll.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: bugs/regressions: report in LKML or in bugzilla?
On Tue, 2010-12-07 at 17:12 +0100, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> Le mardi 07 décembre 2010 à 16:39 +0100, Martin Steigerwald a écrit :
>
> > A participant of a linux performance training I hold found a bug with
> > window scaling which did not receive any reply as well:
> >
> > Bug 20312 - System freeze with multiples of 32 in
> > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_adv_win_scale
> > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20312
> >
>
> User bug ?
>
> Documentation/networking/ip-sysctl.txt
>
> tcp_adv_win_scale - INTEGER
> Count buffering overhead as bytes/2^tcp_adv_win_scale
> (if tcp_adv_win_scale > 0) or bytes-bytes/2^(-tcp_adv_win_scale),
> if it is <= 0.
> Default: 2
>
> Given we use 32bit numbers, using values outside of [-31 ... 31] makes litle sense.
>
> We could add sysctl range limit, but user should not mess with
> /proc/sys/net/ipv4/parameters unless he knows what he is doing ?
[...]
For mere humans, the range is not quite os obvious. Which is why this
has been fixed in net-2.6 (as noted on that bug report now).
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings, Senior Software Engineer, Solarflare Communications
Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job.
They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists