[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201012072228.58728.Martin@lichtvoll.de>
Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2010 22:28:57 +0100
From: Martin Steigerwald <Martin@...htvoll.de>
To: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: bugs/regressions: report in LKML or in bugzilla?
Am Dienstag 07 Dezember 2010 schrieb Ben Hutchings:
> On Tue, 2010-12-07 at 17:12 +0100, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > Le mardi 07 décembre 2010 à 16:39 +0100, Martin Steigerwald a écrit :
> > > A participant of a linux performance training I hold found a bug
> > > with window scaling which did not receive any reply as well:
> > >
> > > Bug 20312 - System freeze with multiples of 32 in
> > > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_adv_win_scale
> > > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20312
> >
> > User bug ?
> >
> > Documentation/networking/ip-sysctl.txt
> >
> > tcp_adv_win_scale - INTEGER
> >
> > Count buffering overhead as bytes/2^tcp_adv_win_scale
> > (if tcp_adv_win_scale > 0) or bytes-bytes/2^(-tcp_adv_win_scale),
> > if it is <= 0.
> > Default: 2
> >
> > Given we use 32bit numbers, using values outside of [-31 ... 31]
> > makes litle sense.
> >
> > We could add sysctl range limit, but user should not mess with
> > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/parameters unless he knows what he is doing ?
>
> [...]
>
> For mere humans, the range is not quite os obvious. Which is why this
> has been fixed in net-2.6 (as noted on that bug report now).
>
> Ben.
I verified the fix on 2.6.37-rc5.
Thanks,
--
Martin 'Helios' Steigerwald - http://www.Lichtvoll.de
GPG: 03B0 0D6C 0040 0710 4AFA B82F 991B EAAC A599 84C7
Download attachment "signature.asc " of type "application/pgp-signature" (199 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists