linux-kernel - Re: [06/44] numa: fix slab_node(MPOL

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20101208041725.GB2291@suse.de>
Date:	Tue, 7 Dec 2010 20:17:25 -0800
From:	Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To:	Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@...com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...nel.org,
	stable-review@...nel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
	Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>, Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
Subject: Re: [06/44] numa: fix slab_node(MPOL_BIND)

On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 10:03:42PM -0500, Lee Schermerhorn wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-12-07 at 16:04 -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > 2.6.27-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
> > 
> > ------------------
> > 
> > From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
> > 
> > commit 800416f799e0723635ac2d720ad4449917a1481c upstream.
> > 
> > When a node contains only HighMem memory, slab_node(MPOL_BIND)
> > dereferences a NULL pointer.
> > 
> > [ This code seems to go back all the way to commit 19770b32609b: "mm:
> >   filter based on a nodemask as well as a gfp_mask".  Which was back in
> >   April 2008, and it got merged into 2.6.26.  - Linus ]
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
> > Cc: Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>
> > Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
> > Cc: Lee Schermerhorn <lee.schermerhorn@...com>
> > Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>
> > 
> > ---
> >  mm/mempolicy.c |    2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > --- a/mm/mempolicy.c
> > +++ b/mm/mempolicy.c
> > @@ -1404,7 +1404,7 @@ unsigned slab_node(struct mempolicy *pol
> >  		(void)first_zones_zonelist(zonelist, highest_zoneidx,
> >  							&policy->v.nodes,
> >  							&zone);
> > -		return zone->node;
> > +		return zone ? zone->node : numa_node_id();
> 
> I think this should be numa_mem_id().  Given the documented purpose of
> slab_node(), we want a node from which page allocation is likely to
> succeed.  numa_node_id() can return a memoryless node for, e.g.,  some
> configurations of some HP ia64 platforms.  numa_mem_id() was introduced
> to return that same node from which "local" mempolicy would allocate
> pages.

So should the upstream patch be changed?

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/