linux-kernel - Re: hunt for 2.6.37 dm-crypt+ext4 corruption?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4CFF3BE7.40007@redhat.com>
Date:	Wed, 08 Dec 2010 09:03:51 +0100
From:	Milan Broz <mbroz@...hat.com>
To:	Jon Nelson <jnelson@...poni.net>
CC:	Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com>,
	Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>, Matt <jackdachef@...il.com>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	linux-btrfs <linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org>,
	dm-devel <dm-devel@...hat.com>,
	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	htd <htd@...cy-poultry.org>, htejun <htejun@...il.com>,
	linux-ext4 <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: hunt for 2.6.37 dm-crypt+ext4 corruption?


On 12/08/2010 04:29 AM, Jon Nelson wrote:
> Maybe not so fantastic. I kept testing and had no more failures. At
> all. After 40+ iterations I gave up.
> I went back to trying ext4 on a LUKS volume. The 'hit' ratio went to
> something like 1 in 3, or better.

Encryption usually propagates bit corruption (not sure if it is
in this case). But in principle if there is one bit corrupted,
after decryption the whole sector is corrupted.
(That's why bit media errors have usually more serious impact
with FDE.)

Isn't there random noise instead of zeroes when reading
sparse files?
We should probably write some test focusing on sparse files
handling here...

Milan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/