linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Tree for December 8 (drivers/platform/x86/Kconfig:422:error: recursive dependency detected!)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <AANLkTimxa5hOWC2ouLUfLPpWgoKz6ou2b5NzGwWfNLtZ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 8 Dec 2010 11:12:51 +0100
From:	Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...glemail.com>
To:	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
Cc:	Corentin Chary <corentin.chary@...il.com>,
	Matthew Garrett <mjg@...hat.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for December 8 (drivers/platform/x86/Kconfig:422:error:
 recursive dependency detected!)

On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 10:53 AM, David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-12-08 at 10:12 +0100, Corentin Chary wrote:
>>
>> I don't really see how it's a recursive dependency, but maybe it's
>> time to clean this KConfig.
>> What is our current policy about that ?
>>
>> I think we should *depends* on important subsystem (ACPI, INPUT, ...)
>> and select obscure things so
>> that the driver does not get lost if you don't enable the leds.
>
> A better policy is: "NEVER USE SELECT".

Yes, confirmed (see my patch to MLs).

- Sedat -
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/