linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] Common struct clk implementation, v8

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 8 Dec 2010 18:51:22 +0800
From:	Jeremy Kerr <jeremy.kerr@...onical.com>
To:	"Uwe Kleine-König" 
	<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
Cc:	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Common struct clk implementation, v8

Hi Uwe,

> I would have expected that clk-common is an ancestor of clk-common-mx51.
> Currently it bases on v7(?) that doesn't have the spinlock.
> 
> BTW, I took a quick look over the patches in clk-common-mx51 and I think
> arch/arm/plat-mxc/include/mach/clock.h doesn't compile without
> CONFIG_USE_COMMON_STRUCT_CLK (because then there is no struct clk_mxc),
> so either you need more magic or just remove the #ifndef
> CONFIG_USE_COMMON_STRUCT_CLK.

Ah, I haven't pushed updates to the clk-common-mx51 branch yet, I'll get to 
this soon.

Cheers,


Jeremy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/