[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1291806810.28378.2.camel@laptop>
Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 12:13:30 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>
Cc: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
Frank Blaschka <frank.blaschka@...ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...nel.org,
Christof Schmitt <christof.schmitt@...ibm.com>,
Horst Hartmann <horsth@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: [stable] [patch 2/3] nohz: fix printk_needs_cpu() return value
on offline cpus
On Wed, 2010-12-08 at 09:07 +0100, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 01:32:41PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 01:11:52PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2010-11-26 at 13:00 +0100, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> > > > plain text document attachment (002_printk_needs_cpu.diff)
> > > > From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>
> > > >
> > > > This patch fixes a hang observed with 2.6.32 kernels where timers got
> > > > enqueued on offline cpus.
> [...]
> >
> > Is this going to make it into .37, or is it going to wait until .38?
>
> I hope it will go into .37. The same should be true for the
> get_next_timer_interrupt() which addresses the same problem.
> Peter, Ingo?
Ingo just send the pull request to Linus for two of the three patches,
I'll try and feed him the last one today.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists