[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20101208134712.GB16923@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2010 14:47:12 +0100
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Florian Mickler <florian@...kler.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Américo Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [regression, 2.6.37-rc1] 'ip link tap0 up' stuck in do_exit()
On 12/08, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>
> On 12/08, Florian Mickler wrote:
> >
> > [ ccing Ingo and Oleg ] as suggested
>
> Well. Of course I can't explain this bug. But, looking at this email
> I do not see amything strange in exit/schedule/etc.
>
> > > >> > > > This is resulting in the command 'ip link set tap0 up' hanging as a zombie:
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > root 3005 1 0 16:53 pts/3 00:00:00 /bin/sh /vm-images/qemu-ifup tap0
> > > >> > > > root 3011 3005 0 16:53 pts/3 00:00:00 /usr/bin/sudo /sbin/ip link set tap0 up
> > > >> > > > root 3012 3011 0 16:53 pts/3 00:00:00 [ip] <defunct>
>
> That is. ip is a zombie.
And. I do not know if this matters or not, but "the command 'ip link
set tap0 up' hanging as a zombie" does not look right.
This was spawned by
> >> > > > if [ -n "$1" ];then
> >> > > > /usr/bin/sudo /sbin/ip link set $1 up
> >> > > > sleep 0.5s
> >> > > > /usr/bin/sudo /usr/sbin/brctl addif $switch $1
> >> > > > exit 0
> >> > > > fi
The command does not hang. But it forks the child with pid == 3012,
this child exits.
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists