linux-kernel - Re: hunt for 2.6.37 dm-crypt+ext4 corruption? (was: Re: dm-crypt barrier support is effective)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <AANLkTinQw6DZuTiKzmJFo10snbSX9r6+eWuTA8tt3J95@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 8 Dec 2010 09:26:25 -0600
From:	Jon Nelson <jnelson@...poni.net>
To:	"Ted Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>, Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>,
	Jon Nelson <jnelson@...poni.net>,
	Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com>,
	Matt <jackdachef@...il.com>, Milan Broz <mbroz@...hat.com>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	linux-btrfs <linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org>,
	dm-devel <dm-devel@...hat.com>,
	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	htd <htd@...cy-poultry.org>, htejun@...il.com,
	linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: hunt for 2.6.37 dm-crypt+ext4 corruption? (was: Re: dm-crypt
 barrier support is effective)

On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 9:37 PM, Jon Nelson <jnelson@...poni.net> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 1:35 PM, Ted Ts'o <tytso@....edu> wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 01:22:43PM -0500, Mike Snitzer wrote:
>>> > 1. create a database (from bash):
>>> >
>>> > createdb test
>>> >
>>> > 2. place the following contents in a file (I used 't.sql'):
>>> >
>>> > begin;
>>> > create temporary table foo as select x as a, ARRAY[x] as b FROM
>>> > generate_series(1, 10000000 ) AS x;
>>> > create index foo_a_idx on foo (a);
>>> > create index foo_b_idx on foo USING GIN (b);
>>> > rollback;
>>> >
>>> > 3. execute that sql:
>>> >
>>> > psql -f t.sql --echo-all test
>>> >
>>> > With 2.6.34.7 I can re-run [3] all day long, as many times as I want,
>>> > without issue.
>>> >
>>> > With 2.6.37-rc4-13 (the currently-installed KOTD kernel) if tails
>>> > pretty frequently.
>>
>> So I just tried to reproduce this on an Ubuntu 10.04 system running
>> 2.6.37-rc5 (completely stock except for a few apparmor patches that I
>> needed to keep the apparmor userspace from complaining).  I'm using
>> Postgres 8.4.5-0ubuntu10.04.
>>
>> Using the above procedure, I wasn't able to reproduce.  Then I
>> realized this might have been because I was using an SSD root file
>> system (which is secured using LUKS/dm-crypt, with LVM on top of
>> dm-crypt).  So I mounted a file system on a 5400 rpm SSD disk, which
>> is also protected using LUKS/dm-crypt with LVM on top.  I then
>> executed the PostgresQL commands:
>>
>> CREATE TABLESPACE test LOCATION '/kbuild/postgres';
>> SET default_tablespace = test;
>> COMMIT
>> \quit
>>
>> I then re-ran the above proceduing, and verified that all of the I/O
>> was going to the 5400rpm laptop disk.
>>
>> I then ran the above procedure a half-dozen times, and I still haven't
>> been able to reproduce any Postgresql errors or kernel errors.
>>
>> Jon, can you help me identify what might be different with your run
>> and mine?  What version of Postgres are you using?
>
> One difference is the location of the transaction logs (pg_xlog). In
> my case, /var/lib/pgsql/data *is* mountpoint for the test volume
> (actually, it's a symlink to the mount point). In your case, that is
> not so. Perhaps that makes a difference?  pgsql_tmp might also be on
> two different volumes in your case (I can't be sure).


I grabbed a Kubuntu iso and installed Kubuntu 10.10, and then upgraded
to 'natty', and eventually to 2.6.37-8-generic.

With that install, and postgresql's "data" (/var/lib/postgresql/data)
being located on a LUKS+ext4 volume, I easily observe the behavior.

Does this help?

-- 
Jon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/