[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=TYecfTGZ8iUDJPy+2HFTFYOjDEVxxE_1_Dvwf@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2010 16:43:33 +0100
From: Linus Walleij <linus.ml.walleij@...il.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@...uu.se>,
Venkatesh Pallipadi <venki@...gle.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
John Stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [BUG] 2.6.37-rc3 massive interactivity regression on ARM
2010/12/8 Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>:
> Like said, John Stultz was already looking at doing something like that
> because there's a number of architectures suffering this same problem
> and they're all already using part of the clocksource infrastructure to
> implement the sched_clock() interface simply because they only have a
> single hardware resource.
I was in on that discussion and for the Ux500 this patch was the
outcome:
http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/patches/viewpatch.php?id=6488/1
It seems to work, mostly, it's based off Nico's orion code and
just tries to make everything as explicit as possible.
Uwe has also been onto it I think.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists