[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1291836568.15873.58.camel@homepc>
Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 22:29:28 +0300
From: Igor Plyatov <plyatov@...il.com>
To: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@...osoft.com>
Cc: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>,
Ryan Mallon <ryan@...ewatersys.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux@...im.org.za, linux@....linux.org.uk,
costa.antonior@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mach-at91: Support for gms board added
Dear Jean-Christophe,
> > I have exactly the same feeling as Ryan. We should make sure
> > to factorize as much code as possible for maintenance reasons.
> >
> > If you need to distinguish between board features, you can
> > pass information in system_rev as implemented in this
> > board merging commit:
> > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=a6e016f19d393fbe4e040bee8155b03b840fa689
> I agree with nico not need to have a new board for just few difference
>
> and as we start with the rm9200 we will reduce the number of defconfig first per soc and then for the all sam9
I think it does not make sence to invent new machine for each new
carrier board. Better to have a kernel configuration options which will
allow to select required carrier board.
Best regards!
--
Igor Plyatov
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists