linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] New jhash function

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <201012090753.46050.rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Date:	Thu, 9 Dec 2010 07:53:45 +1030
From:	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	kadlec@...ckhole.kfki.hu, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org,
	torvalds@...l.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] New jhash function

On Thu, 9 Dec 2010 03:39:54 am David Miller wrote:
> From: Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@...ckhole.kfki.hu>
> Date: Fri,  3 Dec 2010 13:38:59 +0100
> 
> > The current jhash.h implements the lookup2() hash function by Bob Jenkins. 
> > However, lookup2() is outdated as Bob wrote a new hash function called 
> > lookup3(). There is a longer comparison of those two and other hash
> > functions at http://burtleburtle.net/bob/hash/doobs.html.
> > 
> > Please consider applying the following patches.
> 
> Patch #1 is already in the net-next-2.6 tree, and as long as there are
> no major objections to the general crowd (including Rusty et al.) I am
> happy to put patch #2 into my tree as well.
> 
> Rusty, does the current version of patch #2 look good to you?

Yes, 2/2 good.  Thanks Jozsef!

Acked-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/