[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <m1oc8vetru.fsf@fess.ebiederm.org>
Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 15:20:37 -0800
From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>,
Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@...driver.com>,
"linux-kernel\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Haren Myneni <hbabu@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: perf hw in kexeced kernel broken in tip
Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com> writes:
> On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 03:59:16PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>> On Wed, 2010-12-08 at 15:20 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>>
>> > > I wonder if you should reverse these checks. If the bios has the perf
>> > > counter enabled, there might be a high chance that it fails the first
>> > > check and never gets to the actually bios checks.
>> >
>> > Ah, good point.
>>
>> Something like so..
>
> This seems to work correctly on my Nehalem and broken bios machines during
> boot and kexec. As expected it fails during kdump. My p4 box failed
> during kexec for some reason. But p4 has other issues.
Does the kdump kernel still boot?
It looks like it should I just want to double check.
Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists