[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20101208153428.93c95c54.randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2010 15:34:28 -0800
From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
To: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
Cc: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
Corentin Chary <corentin.chary@...il.com>,
sedat.dilek@...il.com, Matthew Garrett <mjg@...hat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for December 8
(drivers/platform/x86/Kconfig:422:error: recursive dependency detected!)
On Wed, 08 Dec 2010 23:08:39 +0000 David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-12-08 at 13:51 -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> >
> > I dislike select, but reality is that modules do need to select/enable
> > library code and minor features sometimes.
> >
> > OTOH, where drivers/platform/x86/Kconfig:ACPI_CMPC does "select INPUT"
> > to enable an entire subsystem is wrong and bad IMO.
>
> This is just a deficiency in the tools. The correct answer is to fix the
> damn tools, not invent this silly 'select' facility which means much the
> same thing as 'depends on' but is implemented differently.
>
> As long ago as the mid-1990s, the Nemesis research OS was using a tcl
> xconfig tool based on the Linux one, but which would show you the
> dependencies for an option that was disabled, so you could enable them
> where you needed to. Rather than just hiding the option completely.
xconfig has options that show all symbols. I use that most of the time,
but I bet that most people do not.
---
~Randy
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists