[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20101208154218.4a497920.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2010 15:42:18 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Michel Lespinasse <walken@...gle.com>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...nel.dk>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Gleb Natapov <gleb@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] mlock: do not hold mmap_sem for extended periods of
time
On Thu, 2 Dec 2010 16:16:51 -0800
Michel Lespinasse <walken@...gle.com> wrote:
> __get_user_pages gets a new 'nonblocking' parameter to signal that the
> caller is prepared to re-acquire mmap_sem and retry the operation if needed.
> This is used to split off long operations if they are going to block on
> a disk transfer, or when we detect contention on the mmap_sem.
Doesn't apply to linux-next because the KVM guys snuck in a new
FAULT_FLAG_MINOR (who knew?). With a bonus, undocumented,
exported-to-modules get_user_pages_noio().
I liked your code better so I munged __get_user_pages() together thusly:
cond_resched();
while (!(page = follow_page(vma, start, foll_flags))) {
int ret;
unsigned int fault_flags = 0;
if (foll_flags & FOLL_WRITE)
fault_flags |= FAULT_FLAG_WRITE;
if (nonblocking)
fault_flags |= FAULT_FLAG_ALLOW_RETRY;
if (foll_flags & FOLL_MINOR)
fault_flags |= FAULT_FLAG_MINOR;
ret = handle_mm_fault(mm, vma, start,
fault_flags);
please review the end result..
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists