[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1291873283-sup-9561@au1.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 16:54:44 +1100
From: Ian Munsie <imunsie@....ibm.com>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: [patch 0/9] perf: Consolidate the event handling and ordering
Excerpts from Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo's message of Thu Dec 09 07:24:52 +1100 2010:
> Hi Ian,
>
> Have you had the chance of reviewing/testing this patch series
> so that we know that your needs are satisfied with it?
Hi Arnaldo,
Sorry I didn't get around to reviewing them yesterday. Overall they look
pretty good, other than the fall back issue running them the userspace
tool on an unpatched kernel I mentioned.
I've added my patch to enable the sorting in perf record. This time I
also enabled it in perf annotate and perf diff as I realised they would
also need the ordering to properly attribute the samples. I haven't
added it to any other commands - some already enable ordered_samples, so
we wouldn't want to enable ordering_requires_timestamps on them, and I
don't think any of the remaining commands need it.
Cheers,
-Ian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists