linux-kernel - Re: [121/127] [S390] nmi: fix clock comparator revalidation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20101209062304.GA10183@osiris.boeblingen.de.ibm.com>
Date:	Thu, 9 Dec 2010 07:23:04 +0100
From:	Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>
To:	Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...nel.org,
	stable-review@...nel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
	Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [121/127] [S390] nmi: fix clock comparator revalidation

On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 09:13:31AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 09:04:28AM +0100, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> > This line won't compile on 2.6.32. That's why I sent a slightly different
> > patch to -stable (and also the reason why I removed Martin's Sign-off) ;)
> 
> Ah, please be more clear that you are sending a modifed version for me
> to apply instead of taking the upstream patch directly, which is the
> default for me to do so in order to make sure nothing is incorrect.

Ok, will do next time. Sorry for the confusion.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/