[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4D0087EE.90307@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 15:40:30 +0800
From: Cong Wang <amwang@...hat.com>
To: Neil Horman <nhorman@...hat.com>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jiri Pirko <jpirko@...hat.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.hengli.com.au>,
bonding-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
Jay Vosburgh <fubar@...ibm.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
Subject: Re: [v3 PATCH 1/2] bonding: sync netpoll code with bridge
On 12/09/10 15:33, Cong Wang wrote:
>>>
>>> /* close slave before restoring its mac address */
>>> dev_close(slave_dev);
>>> @@ -2061,6 +2098,7 @@ static int bond_release_and_destroy(struct
>>> net_device *bond_dev,
>>>
>>> ret = bond_release(bond_dev, slave_dev);
>>> if ((ret == 0)&& (bond->slave_cnt == 0)) {
>>> + bond_dev->priv_flags |= IFF_DISABLE_NETPOLL;
>> Why are you setting IFF_DISABLE_NETPOLL here? That seems unnecessecary
>>
>
> It gets removed in patch 2/2. :)
Oops! I misread IFF_DISABLE_NETPOLL as IFF_IN_NETPOLL...
I think there is a small window between bond_release() and unregister_netdevice(),
setting this could prevent netpoll is setup again on this bond?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists