[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1291880979-16309-1-git-send-email-walken@google.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2010 23:49:37 -0800
From: Michel Lespinasse <walken@...gle.com>
To: Nick Piggin <npiggin@...nel.dk>, linux-mm@...ck.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] RFC: page munlock issues when breaking up COW
I'm sending this up as RFC only as I've only done minimal testing so far -
I would actually be particularly interested in comments about any corner
cases I must make sure to test for...
It looks like there is a race in the do_wp_page() code that munlocks the
old page after breaking up COW. The pte still points to that old page,
so I don't see that we are protected against vmscan mlocking back the
page right away. This can be easily worked around by moving that code to
the end of do_wp_page(), after the pte has been pointed to the new page.
Also, the corresponding code in __do_fault() seems entirely unnecessary,
since there was never a pte pointing to the old page in our vma.
I found this by code inspection only, and while I believe I understand
this code well by now, there is always the possibility that I may have
missed something. I hope Nick can comment, since he wrote this part of
the code.
Michel Lespinasse (2):
mlock: fix race when munlocking pages in do_wp_page()
mlock: do not munlock pages in __do_fault()
mm/memory.c | 32 ++++++++++++--------------------
1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
--
1.7.3.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists