linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Tree for December (Reverts in tip tree)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <AANLkTim9P7vpxLOPcRUeEyhe3g4PATK6Fq5UqN3KW6iA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 9 Dec 2010 09:06:22 +0100
From:	Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...glemail.com>
To:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for December (Reverts in tip tree)

Hi,

while looking over Stehen's "ChangeLog" from [1]:

"...The tip tree still has its build failures so I have reverted 3 commits..."

This are the patches:

Revert "perf, arch: Cleanup perf-pmu init vs lockup-detector"
Revert "x86, nmi_watchdog: Remove the old nmi_watchdog"
Revert "x86, nmi_watchdog: Remove all stub function calls from old nmi_watchdog"

The first time they have to be reverted was in next-20101130 [2].
Just curious, Is this going to be fixed?
Are there patches around for testing?
Don't misunderstand me, the solution is not vitally important to me :-).

Regards,
- Sedat -

[1] http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/12/8/517
[2] http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/next-20101130
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/