| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20101209000945.GA5798@shaohui>
Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2010 08:09:45 +0800
From: Shaohui Zheng <shaohui.zheng@...el.com>
To: Eric B Munson <emunson@...bm.net>
Cc: Shaohui Zheng <shaohui.zheng@...ux.intel.com>,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, haicheng.li@...ux.intel.com,
lethal@...ux-sh.org, ak@...ux.intel.com, rientjes@...gle.com,
dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, gregkh@...e.de,
Haicheng Li <haicheng.li@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [1/7,v8] NUMA Hotplug Emulator: documentation
On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 10:46:33AM -0700, Eric B Munson wrote:
> Shaohui,
>
> I have had some success. I had run into confusion on the memory hotplug with
> which files to be using to online memory. The latest patch sorted it out for me
> and I can now online disabled memory in new nodes. I still cannot online an offlined
> cpu. Of the 12 available thread, I have 8 activated on boot with the kernel command line:
>
> mem=8G numa=possible=12 maxcpus=8 cpu_hpe=on
>
> I can offline a CPU just fine according to the kernel:
> root@...t:/sys/devices/system/cpu# echo 7 > release
> (dmesg)
> [ 911.494852] offline cpu 7.
> [ 911.694323] CPU 7 is now offline
>
> But when I try and re-add it I get an error:
> root@...t:/sys/devices/system/cpu# echo 0 > probe
> (dmesg)
> Dec 8 10:41:55 bert kernel: [ 1190.095051] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> Dec 8 10:41:55 bert kernel: [ 1190.095056] WARNING: at fs/sysfs/dir.c:451 sysfs_add_one+0xce/0x180()
> Dec 8 10:41:55 bert kernel: [ 1190.095057] Hardware name: System Product Name
> Dec 8 10:41:55 bert kernel: [ 1190.095058] sysfs: cannot create duplicate filename '/devices/system/cpu/cpu7'
> Dec 8 10:41:55 bert kernel: [ 1190.095060] Modules linked in: nfs binfmt_misc lockd fscache nfs_acl auth_rpcgss sunrpc snd_hda_codec_hdmi snd_hda_codec_realtek radeon snd_hda_intel snd_hda_codec snd_cmipci gameport snd_pcm ttm snd_opl3_lib drm_kms_helper snd_hwdep snd_mpu401_uart drm uvcvideo snd_seq_midi snd_rawmidi snd_seq_midi_event snd_seq xhci_hcd snd_timer videodev snd_seq_device snd psmouse i7core_edac i2c_algo_bit edac_core joydev v4l1_compat shpchp snd_page_alloc v4l2_compat_ioctl32 soundcore hwmon_vid asus_atk0110 max6650 serio_raw hid_microsoft usbhid hid firewire_ohci firewire_core crc_itu_t ahci sky2 libahci
> Dec 8 10:41:55 bert kernel: [ 1190.095088] Pid: 2369, comm: bash Tainted: G W 2.6.37-rc5-numa-test+ #3
> Dec 8 10:41:55 bert kernel: [ 1190.095089] Call Trace:
> Dec 8 10:41:55 bert kernel: [ 1190.095094] [<ffffffff8105eb1f>] warn_slowpath_common+0x7f/0xc0
> Dec 8 10:41:55 bert kernel: [ 1190.095096] [<ffffffff8105ec16>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x46/0x50
> Dec 8 10:41:55 bert kernel: [ 1190.095098] [<ffffffff811cf77e>] sysfs_add_one+0xce/0x180
> Dec 8 10:41:55 bert kernel: [ 1190.095100] [<ffffffff811cf8b1>] create_dir+0x81/0xd0
> Dec 8 10:41:55 bert kernel: [ 1190.095102] [<ffffffff811cf97d>] sysfs_create_dir+0x7d/0xd0
> Dec 8 10:41:55 bert kernel: [ 1190.095106] [<ffffffff815a2b3d>] ? sub_preempt_count+0x9d/0xd0
> Dec 8 10:41:55 bert kernel: [ 1190.095109] [<ffffffff812c9ffd>] kobject_add_internal+0xbd/0x200
> Dec 8 10:41:55 bert kernel: [ 1190.095111] [<ffffffff812ca258>] kobject_add_varg+0x38/0x60
> Dec 8 10:41:55 bert kernel: [ 1190.095113] [<ffffffff812ca2d3>] kobject_init_and_add+0x53/0x70
> Dec 8 10:41:55 bert kernel: [ 1190.095117] [<ffffffff8139475f>] sysdev_register+0x6f/0xf0
> Dec 8 10:41:55 bert kernel: [ 1190.095121] [<ffffffff81598f38>] register_cpu_node+0x32/0x88
> Dec 8 10:41:55 bert kernel: [ 1190.095123] [<ffffffff8158207e>] arch_register_cpu_node+0x3e/0x40
> Dec 8 10:41:55 bert kernel: [ 1190.095127] [<ffffffff8101220e>] arch_cpu_probe+0x10e/0x1f0
> Dec 8 10:41:55 bert kernel: [ 1190.095129] [<ffffffff813989d4>] cpu_probe_store+0x14/0x20
> Dec 8 10:41:55 bert kernel: [ 1190.095131] [<ffffffff81393ef0>] sysdev_class_store+0x20/0x30
> Dec 8 10:41:55 bert kernel: [ 1190.095133] [<ffffffff811cd925>] sysfs_write_file+0xe5/0x170
> Dec 8 10:41:55 bert kernel: [ 1190.095137] [<ffffffff811624c8>] vfs_write+0xc8/0x190
> Dec 8 10:41:55 bert kernel: [ 1190.095139] [<ffffffff81162e61>] sys_write+0x51/0x90
> Dec 8 10:41:55 bert kernel: [ 1190.095142] [<ffffffff8100c142>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
> Dec 8 10:41:55 bert kernel: [ 1190.095144] ---[ end trace f615c2a524d318ea ]---
> Dec 8 10:41:55 bert kernel: [ 1190.095149] Pid: 2369, comm: bash Tainted: G W 2.6.37-rc5-numa-test+ #3
> Dec 8 10:41:55 bert kernel: [ 1190.095150] Call Trace:
> Dec 8 10:41:55 bert kernel: [ 1190.095152] [<ffffffff812ca09b>] kobject_add_internal+0x15b/0x200
> Dec 8 10:41:55 bert kernel: [ 1190.095154] [<ffffffff812ca258>] kobject_add_varg+0x38/0x60
> Dec 8 10:41:55 bert kernel: [ 1190.095156] [<ffffffff812ca2d3>] kobject_init_and_add+0x53/0x70
> Dec 8 10:41:55 bert kernel: [ 1190.095158] [<ffffffff8139475f>] sysdev_register+0x6f/0xf0
> Dec 8 10:41:55 bert kernel: [ 1190.095160] [<ffffffff81598f38>] register_cpu_node+0x32/0x88
> Dec 8 10:41:55 bert kernel: [ 1190.095162] [<ffffffff8158207e>] arch_register_cpu_node+0x3e/0x40
> Dec 8 10:41:55 bert kernel: [ 1190.095164] [<ffffffff8101220e>] arch_cpu_probe+0x10e/0x1f0
> Dec 8 10:41:55 bert kernel: [ 1190.095166] [<ffffffff813989d4>] cpu_probe_store+0x14/0x20
> Dec 8 10:41:55 bert kernel: [ 1190.095168] [<ffffffff81393ef0>] sysdev_class_store+0x20/0x30
> Dec 8 10:41:55 bert kernel: [ 1190.095170] [<ffffffff811cd925>] sysfs_write_file+0xe5/0x170
> Dec 8 10:41:55 bert kernel: [ 1190.095172] [<ffffffff811624c8>] vfs_write+0xc8/0x190
> Dec 8 10:41:55 bert kernel: [ 1190.095174] [<ffffffff81162e61>] sys_write+0x51/0x90
> Dec 8 10:41:55 bert kernel: [ 1190.095176] [<ffffffff8100c142>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
>
> Am I doing something wrong?
>
> Thanks,
> Eric
Eric,
I saw that you already get this issue solved in another email, that is good. I double check your step, and I did not find any problems.
the logic to do CPU release(arch_cpu_release),
1) offline the CPU if the CPU is online
2) unregister CPU
so even if the CPU is online, you can still release the CPU directly. I should check the return value after call cpu_down.
How about add the following checking?
--- arch/x86/kernel/topology.c-orig 2010-12-09 08:03:19.883331001 +0800
+++ arch/x86/kernel/topology.c 2010-12-09 08:01:35.993331000 +0800
@@ -158,7 +158,10 @@
if (cpu_online(cpu)) {
printk(KERN_DEBUG "offline cpu %d.\n", cpu);
- cpu_down(cpu);
+ if (!cpu_down(cpu)){
+ printk(KERN_ERR "fail to offline cpu %d, give up.\n", cpu);
+ return -EPERM;
+ }
}
arch_unregister_cpu(cpu);
--
Thanks & Regards,
Shaohui
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists