linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] mfd: tps6586x: Remove device ID check

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 9 Dec 2010 14:58:58 +0100
From:	Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>
To:	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, achew@...dia.com, olofj@...omium.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mfd: tps6586x: Remove device ID check

Hi Stephen,

On Thu, Dec 02, 2010 at 11:33:22AM -0700, Stephen Warren wrote:
> ... and convert it to a dev_info print at probe time.
> 
> There are many variants of this chip with different values of VERSIONCRC.
> The set of values is large, and not useful to enumerate. All are SW
> compatible. The difference lies in default settings of the various power
> rails, and other similar differences. The driver, or clients of the
> driver, shouldn't be affected by this, since all rails should be
> programmed into the desired state in all cases for correct operation.
Fair enough, but then you can remove the TPS658621A_VERSIONCRC and
TPS658621C_VERSIONCRC defines.

Cheers,
Samuel.

-- 
Intel Open Source Technology Centre
http://oss.intel.com/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/