[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1291908773.29292.16.camel@twins>
Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 16:32:53 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To: mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
efault@....de, bbb.lst@...il.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
yong.zhang0@...il.com, mingo@...e.hu
Cc: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [tip:sched/urgent] Sched: fix skip_clock_update optimization
On Wed, 2010-12-08 at 20:40 +0000, tip-bot for Mike Galbraith wrote:
> @@ -4063,6 +4062,8 @@ need_resched_nonpreemptible:
>
> put_prev_task(rq, prev);
> next = pick_next_task(rq);
> + clear_tsk_need_resched(prev);
> + rq->skip_clock_update = 0;
>
> if (likely(prev != next)) {
> sched_info_switch(prev, next);
> @@ -4071,6 +4072,7 @@ need_resched_nonpreemptible:
> rq->nr_switches++;
> rq->curr = next;
> ++*switch_count;
> + WARN_ON_ONCE(test_tsk_need_resched(next));
I just managed to trigger this one.. will try and reproduce to find out
wth happened.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists