[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1291911534.29040.0.camel@jaguar>
Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 18:18:54 +0200
From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...hat.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
hpa@...or.com, x86@...nel.org, eric.dumazet@...il.com,
yinghai@...nel.org, brgerst@...il.com, gorcunov@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH UPDATED#3 04/16] x86: setup_local_APIC() must always be
called with preemption disabled
On Thu, 2010-12-09 at 11:47 +0100, Tejun Heo wrote:
> setup_local_APIC() is used to setup local APIC early during CPU
> initialization and already assumes that preemption is disabled on
> entry. However, The function unnecessarily disables and enables
> preemption and uses smp_processor_id() multiple times in and out of
> the nested preemption disabled section. This gives the wrong
> impression that the function might be able to handle being called with
> preemption enabled and/or migrated to another processor in the middle.
>
> Make it clear that the function is always called with preemption
> disabled, drop the confusing preemption disable block and call
> smp_processor_id() once at the beginning of the function.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
> Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
> Cc: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>
> Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>
Reviewed-by: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists