[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20101209173247.GB15579@ghostprotocols.net>
Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2010 15:32:47 -0200
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Ian Munsie <imunsie@....ibm.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: [patch 9/9] pref: session: Break event ordering when
timestamps are missing
Em Thu, Dec 09, 2010 at 02:58:10PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner escreveu:
> On Thu, 9 Dec 2010, Ian Munsie wrote:
> > Excerpts from Thomas Gleixner's message of Tue Dec 07 12:49:04 UTC 2010:
> > > Allow the session client to specify that event ordering should be
> > > stopped when not all events have time stamps.
> >
> > > /* These events are processed right away */
> > > switch (event->header.type) {
> > > case PERF_RECORD_HEADER_ATTR:
> > > - return ops->attr(event, session);
> > > + /* This updates session->sample_id_all */
> > > + ret = ops->attr(event, session);
> > > + /* Break ordering if sample_id_all is false */
> > > + if (ops->ordering_requires_timestamps &&
> > > + ops->ordered_samples && !session->sample_id_all) {
> > > + session->ordered_samples.next_flush = ULLONG_MAX;
> > > + flush_sample_queue(session, ops);
> > > + ops->ordered_samples = false;
> > > + }
> > > + return ret;
> > Since the fall back isn't triggered, not only are COMM and MMAP events
> > processed first (from patch 2 in this series), but EXIT will as well,
> > which causes no userspace events to be attributed.
>
> So we need to check this in every event processing path? Or do we have
> for this kind of processing some other method which allows us to
> disable the ordered_samples bit once ?
FYI: I merged everything up to 8/9 and will push to Ingo soon, holler
if you disagree.
- Arnaldo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists