lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTimDWHGsL+1H_VSevSjpFW0-h53NzRynANnayTRm@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 9 Dec 2010 19:33:26 +0100
From:	Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
To:	Guan Xuetao <guanxuetao@...c.pku.edu.cn>
Cc:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv1 008/211] unicore32: new file arch/unicore32/boot/compressed/misc.c

Hi, some trivial tips...

On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 10:38 AM, Guan Xuetao <guanxuetao@...c.pku.edu.cn> wrote:
> From: Guan Xuetao <guanxuetao@...c.pku.edu.cn>
>
>        decompress_kernel call wrapper in c function
>
> Signed-off-by: Guan Xuetao <guanxuetao@...c.pku.edu.cn>
> ---
>  arch/unicore32/boot/compressed/misc.c |  143
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 files changed, 143 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/unicore32/boot/compressed/misc.c
> b/arch/unicore32/boot/compressed/misc.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..28dda37
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/unicore32/boot/compressed/misc.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,143 @@
> +/*
> + * linux/arch/unicore32/boot/compressed/misc.c
> + *
> + * Code specific to PKUnity SoC and UniCore ISA
> + *
> + * Copyright (C) 2001-2010 GUAN Xue-tao
> + *
> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
> + * published by the Free Software Foundation.
> + */
> +
> +#include <asm/unaligned.h>
> +#include <asm/mach/uncompress.h>
> +
> +/*
> + * gzip delarations
> + */
> +unsigned char *output_data;
> +unsigned long output_ptr;
> +
> +unsigned int free_mem_ptr;
> +unsigned int free_mem_end_ptr;
> +
> +#define STATIC static
> +#define STATIC_RW_DATA /* non-static please */
> +
> +/*
> + * arch-dependent implementations
> + */
> +#ifndef ARCH_HAVE_DECOMP_ERROR
> +#define arch_decomp_error(x)
> +#endif
> +
> +#ifndef ARCH_HAVE_DECOMP_SETUP
> +#define        arch_decomp_setup()

Whitespace

> +#endif
> +
> +#ifndef ARCH_HAVE_DECOMP_PUTS
> +#define arch_decomp_puts(p)
> +#endif
> +
> +/* Diagnostic functions */
> +#ifdef DEBUG
> +#  define Assert(cond, msg)    { if (!(cond)) error(msg); }
> +#  define Trace(x)             fprintf x
> +#  define Tracev(x)            { if (verbose)                  fprintf x; }
> +#  define Tracevv(x)           { if (verbose > 1)              fprintf x; }
> +#  define Tracec(c, x)         { if (verbose && (c))           fprintf x; }
> +#  define Tracecv(c, x)                { if ((verbose > 1) && (c))
> fprintf x; }

Maybe uppercase? Maybe do { ... } while(0)?

> +#else
> +#  define Assert(cond, msg)
> +#  define Trace(x)
> +#  define Tracev(x)
> +#  define Tracevv(x)
> +#  define Tracec(c, x)
> +#  define Tracecv(c, x)
> +#endif
> +
> +void *memcpy(void *__dest, __const void *__src, size_t __n)

Why are they underscored?

> +{
> +       int i = 0;
> +       unsigned char *d = (unsigned char *)__dest, *s = (unsigned char
> *)__src;
> +
> +       for (i = __n >> 3; i > 0; i--) {
> +               *d++ = *s++;
> +               *d++ = *s++;
> +               *d++ = *s++;
> +               *d++ = *s++;
> +               *d++ = *s++;
> +               *d++ = *s++;
> +               *d++ = *s++;
> +               *d++ = *s++;
> +       }
> +
> +       if (__n & 1 << 2) {
> +               *d++ = *s++;
> +               *d++ = *s++;
> +               *d++ = *s++;
> +               *d++ = *s++;
> +       }
> +
> +       if (__n & 1 << 1) {
> +               *d++ = *s++;
> +               *d++ = *s++;
> +       }
> +
> +       if (__n & 1)
> +               *d++ = *s++;
> +
> +       return __dest;
> +}
> +
> +void error(char *x)
> +{
> +

Newline

> +       arch_decomp_puts("\n\n");
> +       arch_decomp_puts(x);
> +       arch_decomp_puts("\n\n -- System halted");
> +
> +       arch_decomp_error(x);
> +
> +       do { } while (1); /* Halt */

for (;;);?

> +}
> +
> +/* Heap size should be adjusted for different decompress method */
> +#ifdef CONFIG_KERNEL_GZIP
> +#include "../../../../lib/decompress_inflate.c"
> +#endif
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_KERNEL_BZIP2
> +#include "../../../../lib/decompress_bunzip2.c"
> +#endif
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_KERNEL_LZO
> +#include "../../../../lib/decompress_unlzo.c"
> +#endif
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_KERNEL_LZMA
> +#include "../../../../lib/decompress_unlzma.c"
> +#endif
> +
> +unsigned long

I think that, for new code, no newlines should be written after the return type.

> +decompress_kernel(unsigned long output_start, unsigned long free_mem_ptr_p,
> +               unsigned long free_mem_ptr_end_p)
> +{
> +       unsigned char *tmp;
> +
> +       output_data             = (unsigned char *)output_start;
> +       free_mem_ptr            = free_mem_ptr_p;
> +       free_mem_end_ptr        = free_mem_ptr_end_p;
> +
> +       arch_decomp_setup();
> +
> +       tmp = (unsigned char *) (((unsigned long)input_data_end) - 4);
> +       output_ptr = get_unaligned_le32(tmp);
> +
> +       arch_decomp_puts("Uncompressing Linux...");
> +       decompress(input_data, input_data_end - input_data, NULL, NULL,
> +                       output_data, NULL, error);
> +       arch_decomp_puts(" done, booting the kernel.\n");
> +       return output_ptr;
> +}
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ